Introduction to sociological perspectives:
Humans approach every field of study or specialty from a different perspective. It provides insightful information about the studied subject. In a manner similar to this, sociology examines society, its members, and their relationships from a sociological perspective that extends beyond the personal viewpoints of social beings. Sociology's point of view is always social or collective in nature.
A perspective is a broad societal and behavioral assumption that offers a point of view for the investigation of a particular issue. These three broad perspectives— functionalist, conflict, and interactionist—are all present in contemporary sociology. A major theoretical perspective serves as the main source of inspiration for the majority of sociologists.
Ken Brown provided the illustration to help others comprehend the perspective. Imagine, for instance, that a pickpocket, a police officer, a road sweeper, a shopper, and a merchant are all watching the same busy shopping street. When wallets protrude from pockets or bags, pickpockets see a chance to steal. The policeman observes potential criminal activity and unrest. The trash and litter that other people have left on the road. The merchant may only notice potential consumers despite having windows full of appealing consumer goods to purchase. Although everyone is staring down the same street, they are each focusing on a different part of it. Depending on their "perspective" and what they are looking for, they will see different things. Even if you could believe that some perspectives give a more accurate, comprehensive, and genuine depiction of the street than others do, they all may be viewing things differently, so it's difficult to declare which of their perspectives is correct.
Three main sociological perspectives
The functionalist perspective
The functionalist perspective is a framework for developing a theory that sees society as a complex system whose components cooperate to foster solidarity and stability, according to Maccionis.
In sociology, the functionalist perspective is a way of looking at how different aspects of society work together to sustain the stability of the whole. Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim's writings serve as the perspective's primary sources of inspiration. Spencer likened social structures to living things. Any living thing has a structure, which is a collection of linked parts like a head, limbs, heart, and so forth. Each of these components serves a purpose, which is a beneficial outcome for the entire system, in this case, a living creature. Spencer suggested that society has a structure in a similar way. Family, religion, the military, and other social institutions are some of its interconnected components. Ideally, each of these elements serves a purpose that adds to the social system's overall stability. Modern structural functionalism, (often known as functions-alism), does not insist that a society may be compared to an organism. However, the fundamental notion of society as a network of interconnected elements is still present.
According to functionalist theory, society tends to be a well-organized, stable, and interconnected system where the majority of people share similar core ideals. Every component of the social system, including the state, the family, and the educational system, tends to "fit together" under normal circumstances, maintaining the stability of the system as a whole.
According to the functionalist perspective, society has a natural propensity to be in balance or at equilibrium. Since changes in one area of the system typically lead to changes in other areas of the system, social change is therefore likely to be disruptive unless it proceeds relatively slowly. Social disruption in society was brought on by abrupt and quick changes.
Social order, stability, and harmony in society are the primary concerns of the functionalist. They hold the view that anytime something becomes wholly dysfunctional, society will naturally remove it. No matter how detrimental, if something exists in society, it will undoubtedly serve that society.
Three main sociological perspectives
The Conflict perspective
The conflict perspective is a paradigm for developing a philosophy that sees society as an arena of inequity that breeds conflict and change, according to Maccionis.
In sociology, the conflict perspective is a way of looking at a society that focuses on social processes of conflict, rivalry, and change. The viewpoint was influenced by Karl Marx's writings, who saw the social class conflict as the "engine" of history and the primary agent of change.
Conflict is a persistent element of cultures that are always changing, according to conflict theorists. "Conflict" encompasses tension, animosity, competition, and disagreement over objectives and moral principles but may not always imply open violence. This conflict is a constant and unavoidable aspect of social life; it is not an isolated incident that interrupts society's generally orderly operations.
Although they acknowledge that social conflict may occasionally have that consequence, conflict theorists do not necessarily view it as negative. They contend that conflicts frequently produce fruitful outcomes. It brings people together as they seek their own goals, and conflict between rival organizations brings attention to social issues and brings about positive changes that might not have happened otherwise. Social movements, such as those in support of women's rights or opposing nuclear power, become a significant force for change in this way. Social strife brings about adjustments that keep society from becoming stagnant.
Marx argues that there is a conflict between the bourgeoisie, a powerful and affluent class that owns and controls the means of production, and the proletariat, a class of oppressed workers who are destitute. Marx claims that this battle is one between the wealthy and the poor. According to Marx, the conflict between these two classes is a catalyst for social development. After the bourgeoisie was overthrown by proletarians, this change happened.
Three main sociological perspectives
Symbolic Interactionism
Researchers are encouraged to investigate symbols and nuances, their meanings, and their impact on the interactive relationships of daily life by adopting the symbolic interactionist perspective, often known as symbolic interactionism. According to this viewpoint, symbols have meanings associated with them and are viewed subjectively. It is believed that humans understand their social settings through communication and the transmission of meaning through words and symbols. Such subjective impression is especially clear in verbal exchanges when spoken words are the primary symbols. Conversations are symbolic exchanges between individuals who constantly assess their surroundings. The symbolic interactionist viewpoint is based on Max Weber's claim that people interpret and provide meaning to their environment, and that this interpretation influences how they behave.
The concept of symbolic interactionism aids in societal harmony by assisting individuals in understanding one another's points of view. It encourages social progress and promotes similarity. During international conflicts, politicians and broadcasters use symbols like flags to promote the ideas of unity and social cohesion among citizens and to enlist their support for the armed forces. The cultivation of symbols for various occasions has been encouraged by society. In western nations, Halloween is symbolized with carvings of pumpkins and horror films. A dove holding an olive branch represents world peace. Movements develop symbols to promote their goals and ideologies. When a rainbow flag is present, the LGBTQ+ community is immediately associated with it. As a result, symbols and signs are crucial to society. The symbolic interactionism point of view is constantly examined and contested due to the difficulties of objectivity. Furthermore, detractors attack symbolic interactionists for their scant attention to symbols and communication in social analysis.
Why is it crucial?
Sociological viewpoints help us comprehend ourselves better. In the absence of a sociological perspective, people view society through the narrow lens of their close family, friends, and coworkers. The sociological viewpoint enables us to conceptualize and psychologically distance ourselves from our limited experience, which enables us to comprehend the relationship between individual concerns and societal issues. It enables us to understand how our daily actions and routines relate to societal trends and events. Studies in sociology expose us to facets of society that we might ordinarily ignore or misinterpret. Sociological viewpoints help us accept and understand the perspectives of others because our perspective is shaped by our own experiences, and people with different societal interactions have different conceptions of social existence.
Conclusion
Sociological views are crucial because they give us a window through which to see a society free from our own assumptions and biases. It may be adjusted as the times change and have its own social applicability. The three categories of sociological viewpoints mentioned above are the traditional sociological perspectives. But there are other viewpoints—including Marxism, Feminism, and Postmodernism—that offer various insights into how societies function. Since the sociological theory is continually changing, it should never be viewed as finished. Although new sociological theories expand on and supplement the work of older ones, classic sociological theories are still regarded as significant and up-to-date (Calhoun 2012). The perspectives and theories in sociology will undoubtedly expand greatly as other subfields are developed, but ultimately, they are all focused on understanding society.
Three main sociological perspectivesThree main sociological perspectives
0 Comments